Fortune 500 Companies Maintain Active ICE Contracts in 2025

Major corporations provide various services to immigration enforcement agency
Multiple Fortune 500 companies currently maintain active contracts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), according to government spending data. These corporations provide various services ranging from telecommunications and IT support to delivery services and cleaning supplies. The contracts, many of which were established during the previous administration, continue as ICE operations receive increased funding under the current federal budget.
Prominent companies with active ICE contracts include AT&T with an $83 million telecommunications contract, Booz Allen Hamilton providing data analytics services worth $51.9 million, and Caci International supplying tactical communications maintenance under a $119.9 million agreement. Other notable contractors include Dell, FedEx, General Dynamics, and UPS, offering services from software licensing to package delivery. These contracts vary in duration, with many set to expire between 2025 and 2028.
KEY POINTS
- •14 Fortune 500 firms have ICE contracts
- •Contracts worth millions continue to 2026+
- •White House budget increases ICE funding
The federal government has allocated additional funding for ICE operations in the current budget. According to the article, the White House's proposed budget has designated $75 billion in additional funds for ICE, with approximately $45 million earmarked for increasing capacity in adult detention and family residential centers. This represents a continuation of immigration enforcement priorities established during the current administration.
During the previous Trump administration (2017-2021), corporate relationships with ICE generated controversy. The article notes that employees at companies including Amazon, Microsoft, and Deloitte had previously called on their employers to terminate contracts with ICE, particularly during the implementation of policies that separated migrant families. In some instances, such as with consulting firm McKinsey, employee activism reportedly led to the termination of contracts with immigration-focused federal departments.
Information about corporate contracts with ICE is publicly available through the government's spending database at USASpending.gov. The article indicates that not all corporate work for ICE is immediately identifiable in public records, as some technology companies partner with defense contractors or serve as subcontractors for federal contracts, potentially obscuring their direct involvement in government database searches.