GOP Senators Respond to Questions About Trump Military Parade Costs

Republican lawmakers give varied reactions when asked about $45 million event
Republican senators offered a range of responses when questioned about President Trump's upcoming military parade in Washington D.C. and its estimated $45 million cost. When approached by reporters, several senators avoided directly addressing the parade's price tag, with some declining to comment, changing the subject, or leaving the conversation. The event is scheduled for Saturday and coincides with both the Army's 250th anniversary and President Trump's 79th birthday.
The parade will feature thousands of soldiers, 150 military vehicles, and more than 50 aircraft in the nation's capital. While some Republican senators expressed support for the event, others appeared reluctant to discuss its cost implications. Senator Jim Justice (R-W.Va.) defended the expenditure, suggesting that a significant display was important for America's global image, while Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) was reportedly the only Republican senator who explicitly criticized the parade.
KEY POINTS
- •$45M parade planned for Saturday
- •GOP senators gave mixed responses
- •Coincides with Army anniversary
Some lawmakers cited scheduling conflicts when asked about their attendance plans. Senator Deb Fischer (R-Neb.) stated she would be out of town, Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho) mentioned prior commitments in Boise, and Senator Markwayne Mullen (R-Okla.) noted his 28th wedding anniversary as the reason for his absence. These responses came amid questions about the appropriateness of the expenditure given previous Republican emphasis on reducing government spending.
The military parade is occurring simultaneously with planned nationwide protests. Demonstrations dubbed "No Kings Day" are reportedly organized in all 50 states and more than 1,500 cities in response to recent immigration enforcement measures and the deployment of military personnel to Los Angeles. The contrast between the parade and the protests highlights the polarized reactions to recent administration policies and decisions.